Turkish defence industry head reveals T129 ATAK-2 program


The Head of Turkey’s Undersecretariat for Defence Industries (SSM) İsmail Demir outlined the projected capabilities and specifications of an improved variant of the Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI) T129 ATAK attack helicopter, provisionally designated ATAK-2.

The ATAK-2 announcement was made by Demir in his inaugural speech for Alp Aviation’s newly-opened Helicopter Business Center Facility, which will provide subassemblies for the T-70 Black Hawk, which will be manufactured under license by TAI for the domestic market and prospective export users.

Demir also referenced the TAI 10-ton general-purpose helicopter, stating that participation in the program is open to existing (e.g. Sikorsky) and other partners.

According to Demir (quoted by the state-owned Anadolu Agency), the ATAK-2 will have a maximum take-off weight of 6,000 kg. Besides being heavier, the aim of the ATAK-2 is localize the supply of subsystems, freeing Turkey to exercise maximum agency in exporting the helicopter (e.g. Pakistan is to begin talks for 30 T129 ATAK attack helicopters).

The ATAK-2 will also have improvements over the ATAK, such as increased payload and updated avionics.

Anadolu Agency reports that one of the goals of the ATAK-2 is to re-utilize some of the critical components of the TAI T625 utility helicopter, such as the dynamics parts (e.g. rotor) and transmission system. This will reduce development costs as well as provide technical commonality, reducing operating costs (especially for those operating both the T625 and ATAK-2).

TAI General Manager Temel Kotil, was quoted last week saying that TAI had commenced conceptual work on an ATAK variant with a MTOW of eight tons. It is not clear if Kotil was referring to the same program as Demir.The ATAK-2, while not an eight-ton design, still aligns with the idea of a heavier platform.

Notes & Comments:

The launch of the ATAK-2 program indicates that Turkey is intending to build a complete family of original helicopter platforms. In fact, the ATAK-2 – and emphasis on technical commonality with the T625 – clearly shows that the SSM and TAI foresee military markets for the T625 and 10-ton general purpose helicopter.

The SSM’s statement also indicates that the development of the ATAK-2 is tied to TUSAŞ Engine Industries’ (TEI) turboshaft engine program. The first of TEI’s 1,400 shp engines are scheduled for completion in 2019, with the development of the engine platform requiring up to eight years (IHS Jane’s).

If brought to fruition, this would be a robust helicopter family, from a dedicated attack helicopter paired with a closely related utility helicopter to a 10-ton multi-role helicopter (that may also draw on the same family of engine and dynamic parts technology). Besides leveraging domestic industry arms to a common project, the idea of entering an entire helicopter family (drawing on common subsystems and parts) could be attractive to prospective overseas partners seeking to recapitalize their industries or setting the basis for helicopter manufacturing. The notion of investing in one program to yield multiple results is appealing.



Source link

86 Comments
  1. April 6, 2018 | Reply
  2. April 8, 2018 | Reply
  3. April 8, 2018 | Reply
  4. April 10, 2018 | Reply
  5. April 13, 2018 | Reply
  6. April 13, 2018 | Reply
  7. April 14, 2018 | Reply
  8. April 14, 2018 | Reply
  9. April 17, 2018 | Reply
  10. April 19, 2018 | Reply
  11. April 21, 2018 | Reply
  12. April 24, 2018 | Reply
  13. April 24, 2018 | Reply
  14. April 26, 2018 | Reply
  15. April 28, 2018 | Reply
  16. May 3, 2018 | Reply
  17. May 6, 2018 | Reply
  18. May 7, 2018 | Reply
  19. May 8, 2018 | Reply
  20. May 8, 2018 | Reply
  21. May 12, 2018 | Reply
  22. May 15, 2018 | Reply
  23. May 16, 2018 | Reply
  24. May 17, 2018 | Reply
  25. May 18, 2018 | Reply
  26. May 21, 2018 | Reply
  27. May 25, 2018 | Reply
  28. May 30, 2018 | Reply
  29. May 31, 2018 | Reply
  30. June 1, 2018 | Reply
  31. June 5, 2018 | Reply
  32. June 7, 2018 | Reply
  33. June 7, 2018 | Reply
  34. June 7, 2018 | Reply
  35. June 7, 2018 | Reply
  36. June 8, 2018 | Reply
  37. June 8, 2018 | Reply
  38. June 9, 2018 | Reply
  39. June 9, 2018 | Reply
  40. June 10, 2018 | Reply
  41. June 10, 2018 | Reply
  42. June 10, 2018 | Reply
  43. June 11, 2018 | Reply
  44. June 11, 2018 | Reply
  45. June 12, 2018 | Reply
  46. June 12, 2018 | Reply
  47. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  48. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  49. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  50. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  51. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  52. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  53. June 13, 2018 | Reply
  54. June 15, 2018 | Reply
  55. June 15, 2018 | Reply
  56. June 15, 2018 | Reply
  57. June 16, 2018 | Reply
  58. June 16, 2018 | Reply
  59. June 16, 2018 | Reply
  60. June 17, 2018 | Reply

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: